Helena Rosenblatt is professor of history at the Graduate Center, City University of New York. Her many books include Liberal Values: Benjamin Constant and the Politics of Religion and Thinking with Rousseau: From Machiavelli to Schmitt. She lives in New York City.
"This books challenges some of the assumptions held about
liberalism and reveals the historical foundations of why it may
well be, above all, an elusive tradition."---Alex Tebble, LSE
Review of Books
"Rosenblatt is impressive in the scope of her reading and at her best in identifying different usages of the term liberal."---Peter Clarke, Financial Times
"One of Foreign Affairs' Picks for Best of Books 2018"
"[Rosenblatt] presents liberals as moralists and debunks the notion of liberalism as so exclusively an Anglo-American phenomenon."---Tyler Cowen, Marginal Revolution
"An excellent recent survey of the term."---David A. Bell, The Nation
"Lively and penetrating. . . . Rosenblatt shows that liberalism has survived thanks to its appeal as a moral ideal, a vision of political community that is based not just on interests but also on values: respect, tolerance, and justice."---G. John Ikenberry, Foreign Affairs
"Enlightening." * New York Times Book Review *
"The Lost History of Liberalism is yet another impressive performance from one of the leading intellectual historians and deserving of a broad readership."---Max Skjoensberg, Nations and Nationalism
"I've spent my last days utterly enraptured with a fantastic new book that casts new light on a personal obsession: the history of the word liberalism."---Jeffrey A Tucker, American Institute for Economic Research's Daily Economy
"A dispassionate overview of the term and concepts of liberalism-how it emerged, evolved, diversified, and alienated. Rosenblatt (History/Graduate Center, CUNY) has published previous works about liberalism (Liberal Values: Benjamin Constant and the Politics of Religion, 2008, etc.), and she brings considerable scholarly substance to this work, though most of it forms the infrastructure for the accessible text. . . . There are some true surprises here, too, perhaps most notably the initial liberal opposition to women's rights and a fondness for eugenics in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The author also notes, surprisingly, that factions within various liberal movements were opposed to government help for the poor-a disincentive, they claimed. Fair, balanced, and chockablock with information and surprise." * Kirkus *
"An interesting and informative read, [The Lost History of Liberalism] covers an impressive scope of material."---Alex Tebble, Journal of Liberal History
"Elegantly written. . . . These discussions are welcome additions that help contemporary readers understand liberalism's rich texture and history. . . . As we search for ways to respond to the challenges of the contemporary world, The Lost History of Liberalism offers us a valuable resource."---Christine Dunn Henderson, Los Angeles Review of Books
"One of Isthmus' Most Important Books of 2018 (Dave Cieslewicz)"
"[A] wide-ranging and important book."---Warren Breckman, New Republic
"The Lost History of Liberalism is a masterful work of intellectual history."---Alexandre Lefebvre, Times Higher Education
"In writing another beautifully balanced, intellectually vibrant synthesis of thinkers and themes she knows incredibly well in a very readable style, Rosenblatt offers a simple reminder that there was nothing natural about the evolution of Anglo-American liberalism into liberal democracy and that, because of this, it certainly need not be our modern fate."---Duncan Kelly, Literary Review
"Rosenblatt has meticulously researched the word's history, unearthing forgotten meanings. She moves from liberalism's roots in 19th century France and Germany to its growing association with the United States in the 20th century. Gradually, an idea that began as moralistic - and warned against the dangers of selfishness - underwent a transformation. After World War II, conservatives associated liberalism with the kind of grand social schemes they believed led to totalitarianism. Liberals retreated to a position that emphasized individual rights but not necessarily generosity toward others. Rosenblatt invites a return to this broader, Wisconsin-style view."---M.J. Andersen, Boston Globe