Presses policymakers to implement humane responses to persistent substance use that remove its control entirely from the criminal justice system
Both Bad and Sick2 Criminalizing Deviance: Reconciling the Punitive and Rehabilitative3 "The Right Thing to Do for the Right Reasons": The Institutional Context for the Emergence of Drug Courts 4 "Enlightened Coercion": Making Coercion Work5 "Force Is the Best Medicine": AddictionRecovery, and Coercion6 "Now That We Know the Medicine Works": Expanding the Drug Court Model
Rebecca Tiger is Assistant Professor of Sociology at Middlebury College and co-editor of Bioethical Issues, Sociological Perspectives.
"Recommended. Upper-division undergraduate, graduate, and research collections."-P. Lermack,CHOICE "In a compelling narrative, Judging Addicts shatters the prevailing assumptions about the novelty and success of contemporary drug courts. This brave and fascinating book is a must-read for scholars, practitioners, and advocates in the criminal justice and public health fields."-Mona Lynch,Professor of Criminology, Law & Society, University of California, Irvine "[T]his is an excellent book that will be of interest to sociologists who study punishment, health, deviance, and social control. It is well written and persuasive. Tiger effectively brought the sociology of knowledge to bear on a contemporary, policy-relevant question. This is no small accomplishment. While there are other critical books on drug courts available, Tiger's approach is fresh and unique and therefore should be required reading by anyone studying the drug court movement." -Social Forces "Calling addiction a disease has not reduced stigma and suffering but rather widened the drug war's net of punitive social control. This brilliant book shows the uneasy coexistence of punishment and recovery-a sociologically rich story told in crystalline prose."-Craig Reinarman,Professor of Sociology, University of California, Santa Cruz "Judging Addicts traces the intellectual genealogy of our latest criminal justice reform `fix' to a constellation of ideas about illness and crime, freedom and responsibility, that have driven American justice policies since the Progressive era. An essential read for all of those looking for a real exit to mass incarceration."-Jonathan Simon,Adrian A. Kragen Professor of Law, Berkeley Law School "One of the strengths of this book is the placement of drug courts into their historical context regarding criminal justice reforms. Tiger also offers several good critiques of drug courts, such as their lack of transparency about the number of drug court participants who do not finish and the problematic nature of their advocacy organization (the National Association of Drug Court Professionals) being the main source of data collection and reporting about drug courts. She also does a good job showing the complexity of the issue and the juxtaposition of dealing with addiction as both a disease and a moral failing." -Jennifer Murphy,American Journal of Sociology "[Judging Addicts] is interesting and well written, and perhaps its greatest strength lies in the way in which its author sets her discussion of the drug court initiative in a historic context."-Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy> "Tiger's history and analysis of drug courts are very interesting."-California Lawyer