Introduction The Argument in Brief
Part I. Economics Is in Scientific Trouble
Chapter 1. An Antique, Unethical, and Badly Measured Behaviorism
Doesn't Yield Good Economic Science or Good Politics
Chapter 2. Economics Needs to Get Serious about Measuring the
Economy
Chapter 3. The Number of Unmeasured "Imperfections" Is
Embarrassingly Long
Chapter 4. Historical Economics Can Measure Them, Showing Them to
Be Small
Chapter 5. The Worst of Orthodox Positivism Lacks Ethics and
Measurement
Part II. Neoinstitutionalism Shares in the Troubles
Chapter 6. Even the Best of Neoinstitutionalism Lacks
Measurement
Chapter 7. And "Culture," or Mistaken History, Will Not Repair
It
Chapter 8. That Is, Neoinstitutionalism, Like the Rest of
Behavioral Positivism, Fails as History and as Economics
Chapter 9. As It Fails in Logic and in Philosophy
Chapter 10. Neoinstitutionalism, in Short, Is Not a Scientific
Success
Part III. Humanomics Can Save the Science
Chapter 11. But It's Been Hard for Positivists to Understand
Humanomics
Chapter 12. Yet We Can Get a Humanomics
Chapter 13. And Although We Can't Save Private Max U
Chapter 14. We Can Save an Ethical Humanomics
Acknowledgments
Notes
Works Cited
Index
Deirdre Nansen McCloskey is distinguished professor emerita of economics and history and professor emerita of English and communication, at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
"This new book deepens the continuing conversation in
Humanomics. It's essentially about discovering Adam Smith
and resuming a path that McCloskey has so magnificently helped to
reinvigorate in the last half century." -- Vernon Smith, Chapman
University and 2002 Nobel Laureate in Economics
"The manuscript is a collection of writings for various forums,
many reviews of others and many replies to critics. One unifying
theme is a critique of neoinstitutional economics. But yet another
theme is a defense of the bourgeois trilogy against its critics.
This book is well worth a read." -- Richard Langlois, University of
Connecticut
![]() |
Ask a Question About this Product More... |
![]() |